Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Which emergency light battery is the most cost-effective?

Emergency lights play a crucial role in modern life. Whether in homes, commercial buildings, or public facilities, they provide illumination and indicate exit routes when the regular power supply fails, reducing panic and confusion during emergencies and ensuring safe evacuation. However, to ensure that emergency lights consistently perform their function, the choice of battery is critical. The battery not only directly impacts the performance and reliability of the device but also relates closely to long-term use costs, i.e., cost-effectiveness.

lifepo4 emergency lights battery - plb battery

What is Cost-Effectiveness?

Cost-effectiveness is used to evaluate the economic soundness and performance of an investment, decision or project. In simple terms, it refers to the benefits or returns obtained for a given cost. The cost-effectiveness of a battery considers not just the initial purchase cost but also factors in lifespan, maintenance costs, charging efficiency, and environmental impact. A cost-effective battery should offer advantages in initial investment and demonstrate low cost, high efficiency, and sustainability over long-term use.

Next, we will compare the most commonly used batteries in emergency lights: Nickel-Cadmium (NiCd), Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH), and Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries, to determine which type is more cost-effective.

Nickel-Cadmium Battery

In the past, the most common battery in emergency lights was the Nickel-Cadmium battery, used for many years due to its durability and ability to operate in harsh environments. However, NiCd batteries have low energy density, larger size compared to other battery types, and contain cadmium, a highly toxic metal that is one of the six substances banned by the EU RoHS directive. Although temporarily exempted for use in emergency light batteries, disposal and recycling still pose challenges.

Nickel-Metal Hydride Battery

NiMH batteries have an energy density 30% higher than NiCd batteries, storing more energy per unit volume or mass. They have strong overcharge and over-discharge tolerance, do not contain heavy metals, and have no serious environmental impact. Compared to NiCd batteries, NiMH batteries are less durable in harsh environments, have poor high-temperature charging performance, higher self-discharge rates, and higher material costs.

Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery

With the continuous development of lithium battery technology, LiFePO4 batteries have become a new choice for emergency lights. LiFePO4 batteries offer high energy density, stable chemical properties, high-temperature resistance, long lifespan (more than twice that of NiCd or NiMH batteries), and are free of heavy metals and harmful substances, making them more environmentally friendly. Although the initial procurement cost of LiFePO4 batteries is higher, their overall benefits are superior.

Additionally, emergency light batteries need to stay fully charged during regular power supply to be ready for emergencies. Therefore, the charging method directly affects energy consumption and lifespan. NiCd and NiMH batteries waste energy and shorten their lifespan due to internal oxygen cycles at high charge states. In contrast, LiFePO4 batteries have low internal resistance and self-discharge rates. With smart BMS and long float charge technology, they can minimize energy consumption while maintaining a full charge.

Comparative Analysis

Energy Density (Low to High): NiCd < NiMH < LiFePO4

Safety (High to Low): LiFePO4 > NiMH > NiCd

Cycle Life (High to Low): LiFePO4 > NiMH > NiCd

Compared to NiCd and NiMH batteries, LiFePO4 batteries offer longer lifespan and more efficient charging, leading to lower maintenance costs, reduced recycling needs, and lower replacement costs. Over time, LiFePO4 batteries provide significant returns, making them the most cost-effective choice.

At plb battery, we are dedicated to the development and production of lithium iron phosphate batteries. Our emergency light batteries are high-temperature resistant (operating at up to 75°C), automatically go into sleep mode (usable after 580 days of storage), have a long lifespan (10-year calendar life), and comply with international certification standards (IEC 60598-2-22:2022, IEC 62620, IEC 62133 AS 2293.3, UN 38.3). If you have any needs, feel free to contact us!

Related News

E-mail
SHARE
TOP
PLB focus on providing lithium ion batteries and 26650 cells and packs, welcome to inquiry.
J科技资源 ChatGPT账号出售 51ai